The Livability of Minnesota’s New Minimum Wage

by Camille Galles on 20 July 2014


Governor Dayton signed a new bill raising minimum wage in the State Capitol on April 14th. (Tom Scheck/MPR News)

Governor Dayton signs a new bill raising minimum wage in the state Capitol. (Tom Scheck/MPR News)

On April 15th 2014, Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton signed a bill that officially increases the state’s minimum wage.  Although the wage increase is a government mandate, workers will not see their paychecks grow overnight.  Rather than automatically spiking, the wage increase will be slowly phased in.  Gradual increases over two years will result in a final $9.50 hourly minimum wage by 2016.  The first increase begins on August 1st, 2014, and raises minimum wage from $6.15 to $8.00 an hour, which will benefit 325,000 Minnesotans. Already this is significant—the previous minimum wage of $6.15/hour was among the lowest in the nation.

Please see the points below (courtesy of Minnpost) for an in-depth breakdown of each phase.  “Large employers” are businesses with gross sales of more than $500,000.  This includes large franchised companies, such as target.  “Small employers” have gross sales that are less than $500,000, and would include smaller, privately owned companies.

Thanks to MinnPost for this in-depth breakdown of the Minimum Wage Bill's phases.

Thanks to MinnPost for this in-depth breakdown of the Minimum Wage Bill’s phases.

An additional and important feature of this bill is the way it accommodates inflation.  Inflation leads to higher prices for food, clothing, rent, and other basic necessities.  Beginning in 2018, the minimum wage will continue to increase each year along with these rising costs, a process called “indexing.”  Through this process, the government attempts to make minimum wage livable, and a means by which people can afford to live decent and comfortable lives.  Supporters of the minimum wage bill believe that these wage increases will lift thousands of Minnesotans out of poverty.  But how does this bill account for the cost of housing, one of the most basic, important, and biggest expenses?  Nearly 600,000 households in Minnesota pay more than 30% of their income for housing.  What does this bill mean for these families?

According to this study from the National Low Income Housing Coalition, Minnesotans need to earn $16.46 an hour to rent a two-bedroom unit.  Even if the minimum wage immediately increased to its final amount of $9.50, a household would still need two minimum-wage workers to afford an apartment.  And to afford a two-bedroom apartment in Minneapolis/St.Paul, a household needs to earn $18.19 an hour.  Faced with these statistics, as well as the recent luxury-housing boom throughout the Twin Cities, the new minimum wage increases can seem pretty unsubstantial.

The definition of “economic security”  policymakers seek to create must expand to include the security of having a stable place to sleep at night—affordable housing.  Increasing the minimum wage is helpful, but is just not always enough.  However, this was not the only bill passed this year.  The Homes for All bill was also approved, which substantially increases funding for affordable housing.  Hopefully, these two bills can work together to help close the gap between wages and housing costs.   And in a nation where not a single full-time minimum wage worker anywhere can afford market rate housing, policymakers should take a page out of Minnesota’s book.


Bookmark and Share


Welcome back to Homeline’s Public Policy blog!  Check back often as we begin to cover important Minnesota housing bills that were passed during the 2014 legislative session.  We’ll start by breaking down the “Homes for All” bonding bill, which sets aside  $100 million for affordable housing projects.

Where does this money come from?  The term “bonding” means that the state borrows this money by issuing bonds, which are financial tools that are  similar to loans.  The money the state borrows now will be paid back to bond holders over time with interest. The risk of borrowing so much money is offset by the current low interest and mortgage rates in the housing market, making this an ideal time for the state to invest in housing.  Ensuring the 2014 passage of this bill remained a top priority for Minnesota housing advocates.   A multi-organizational “Homes for All” coalition was formed, which gained endorsement by over 100 groups.

Indeed, this is a first-time  commitment to low-income housing in Minnesota.  $100 million can build or rehab up to 5,000 units!  Although no specific projects have been designated, the funds from the bonding bill will allow the Minnesota Housing and Finance Agency (MHFA) to boost its capacity by nearly $40 million dollars.  MHFA will use this money to build new affordable housing units, establish supportive housing centers, and perhaps most importantly, preserve existing Section 8 housing.

It’s easy to assume that new money automatically equals new housing, but the construction of new units was not the biggest thrust behind the Homes for All bill.  Preserving Section 8 housing is crucial because once it’s gone, you can’t get it back.  Owners that participate in the Section 8 housing program enter contracts that legally bind them to accept low-income tenants.  However, once an owner completes their contract, they can choose to opt out of the program.  This leaves current low-income tenants high and dry, and permanently removes some of the most affordable low-income housing in the state.  Nearly 30% of Minnesota’s Section 8 housing is at risk of vanishing during the next 5 years.  Using this bonding money to preserve Section 8 housing home security for current tenants, and also assures that more expensive units won’t  have to be built to compensate for expiring contracts.

Permanent low-cost housing, such as units participating in the Section 8 program, remains the most effective way to combat homelessness.  $100 million is an exciting opportunity for the local housing community, but it will not provide homes for the estimated 14,000 homeless Minnesotans in one fell swoop.  Even with this new legislature, the demand for affordable housing far outweighs the supply.  The Homes for All bill is a victory for housing policy, but the battle to truly provide homes for all is far from over.


Bookmark and Share

{ 1 comment }

Whose business is housing?

September 25, 2013

Created by OnlineMBA  recently shared this video contrasting how businesses and governments operate and interact with people they serve. Please take a moment to view the video—and return to read how this discussion relates to housing, and in particular, the dynamics of tenant/landlord interactions. If you look at MHP’s most recent 2 x 4 [...]

Read the full article →

HOME Line’s 2013 Tenants’ Bill of Rights and Tenants’ Survey

July 30, 2013

Based on calls from our statewide tenants’ hotline and our organizing efforts, HOME Line has selected nine proposed changes to Minnesota’s landlord/tenant law to push for in the 2014 legislative session.  We believe that these nine bills, each giving greater and clearer rights to Minnesota tenants, will help make our state a more fair and [...]

Read the full article →

Renters: Is a contract for deed a lease?

July 11, 2013

“There’s a real problem out there with landlords scamming people,” said Rep. Joe Mullery, DFL-Minneapolis. “They’re putting people into rentals and then turning those agreements into contract-for-deed sales without even telling them about it. … I think some of those landlords will keep doing it because they think they won’t get caught.” Jeffrey Meitrodt’s July [...]

Read the full article →

Renter’s Credit Increased!

June 17, 2013

As of recently, the legislature passed a $15.5 million increase in Minnesota’s renters’ credit, the tax rebate used to off-set the property taxes households pay through their rent. During the past several years, the legislature showed interest in cutting this important tax credit to help balance the state budget. Due to the on-going advocacy of [...]

Read the full article →

Fresh air for renters with low incomes

January 25, 2013

It does not take very much to understand that the renter’s credit is a big issue for HOME Line. It is something that government officials have been quick to propose as a tool for balancing the state budget, and renters have been quick to fight for it. Since 2004, the renter’s credit has continued to [...]

Read the full article →

What would Voter ID mean for you?

November 5, 2012

I would like to make it clear that Voter ID law is not currently in effect. For the upcoming November 6th election, you will NOT need to present an ID to vote if you are already registered. If you are utilizing same day registration, please look here to see what documentation you will need to [...]

Read the full article →

Voter ID Laws: Creating Barriers Between You and the Ballot

October 17, 2012

Somehow, October is flying by, and election day is almost here! While every election is important, not every election calls voting rights into question. Currently, in Minnesota, you only need an ID to vote if you are registering to vote on election day. For more information on what you need to vote or same-day registration, [...]

Read the full article →

Join the conversation about Minnesota’s future

October 8, 2012

Thanks to the folks at Invest in Minnesota for sharing this great list of up-coming candidate forums! If you want more information about the candidates in your district and what they hope to accomplish in the next state legislative session, consider going to a local forum. Ask them whether they want to protect the Renters’ [...]

Read the full article →