HOME Line

A nonprofit Minnesota tenant advocacy organization

612-728-5767
Toll-free from Greater Minnesota: 866-866-3546
or email an attorney

Call For FREE Legal Help
Llame para información legal GRATUITA
Wac si aad u hesho caawin lacag la’aan ah xaga sharciyada
Peb Pab Pub Dawb

  • Home/About
    • Hours & Directions
    • Mission & History
    • Staff
    • Board of Directors
    • HOME Line Connection Newsletter
    • Client Service & Equity, Inclusion, and Diversity Policies
    • Who Supports Us?
    • Give us Feedback
  • Donate
  • Form Letters
    • Security Deposits
    • Privacy Violation
    • Retaliation Notice
    • Repair Request
    • Response to Invoice for Repairs
    • More Form Letters …
  • Hotline
    • E-mail an Attorney
    • Housing Resources
    • Relevant Publications
    • Court Forms
    • Renter’s Credit (CRP)
    • Purchase The Landlord’s Guide to Minnesota Law
    • Books
    • Selected Legislative History
    • Important Statutes & Selected Cases
    • Local Minimum Heat Rules
  • Trainings
    • All Upcoming Trainings
    • Trainings for Landlords
    • Student Trainings (Both College and High School)
    • Tenant Organizing Webinars
    • Recent Free, Downloadable Webinars
    • Request a Training or a Speaker
  • Volunteer
  • Organize
    • Email an Organizer
    • MN Renter’s Guide to Tenant Organizing
    • Tenant Organizing Webinars
    • Form a Tenant Association
    • Useful Organizing Resources
    • Saving Section 8 Housing
  • Policy
    • Public Policy / Legislative Agenda
    • Minnesota Tenant Bill of Rights
    • Public Policy Blog
    • Local Crime-Free Ordinance Policies
    • New Tenant/Landlord Laws Passed in 2024
    • New Tenant/Landlord Laws Passed in 2023
  • Tenant Narratives
Home / Crime/Drug-Free, disorderly/nuisance conduct rental ordinances in Minnesota

Crime/Drug-Free, disorderly/nuisance conduct rental ordinances in Minnesota

Last updated May 17, 2022 — scroll down for the Hennepin County list, Ramsey County to be added soon

Hundreds of cities across the United States, including in Minnesota, have enacted and enforce local ordinances or regulations often referred to as “crime/drug-free,” “disorderly/nuisance conduct,” or “conduct on licensed premises” ordinances that specifically impact and are enforced on rental housing in these communities. We have previously pointed out a number of serious concerns with such ordinances. These ordinances can have harmful racial equity consequences, disproportionately impact people experiencing domestic violence, and impede tenants access to police and emergency services. We are not alone in drawing attention to the seriously problematic consequences of these ordinances throughout the country (for example HUD and NHLP). We call on cities in Minnesota that have such ordinances on the books to immediately take action to suspend, review, and then amend and/or repeal their ordinances.

Thankfully, some cities are taking action. In 2018, Minneapolis amended their ordinance with some improvements—more could be done. In 2019, St. Louis Park suspended enforcement of their ordinance, convened a community workgroup to review it, and in August 2020 the city council approved amendments to their ordinance that repealed the crime-free provisions, leaving only a few limited references to how disorderly use and police contacts can impact the status of a rental license. Later in 2020, Golden Valley repealed their ordinance and Robbinsdale placed a one-year moratorium on enforcement of their ordinance in order to study it, later deciding in early 2022 to amend but not fully repeal the ordinance. In April/May of 2022, Bloomington is repealed their crime-free ordinance provisions.

HOME Line published an overview of cities that we are aware have enacted and enforce these type of ordinances, so that community members have clear information about the policies impacting them and their neighbors. We began with Hennepin County and will be adding Ramsey County soon in 2022.

The table for Hennepin County is below. Please note, this information is generalized. There are many nuances in each city code/ordinance that make very important differences–such as what type of conduct constitute a violation, how many violations result in a city response, and what types of city actions can be taken on a landlord and/or a tenant. This is why we have cited and linked to the most relevant part of each city’s code or ordinance, so readers of this post can review it themselves. The column headings are generally self-explanatory, however here is a more detailed explanation of several:

  • Lease Addendum Required: The ordinance requires the landlord to insert some type of Crime/Drug-Free or disorderly conduct lease addendum into each lease they enter into with tenants. Here is a sample of this type of lease addendum. The provisions in each required lease addendum do vary from city to city.
  • Criminal Background Search Required: The ordinance requires the landlord to perform some type of formal criminal background search for each prospective tenant/applicant. Most if not all ordinances with this requirement do not necessarily obligate the landlord act in one way or the other in response to what comes back on a report, but simply the requirement may influence how they screen out people with any level of criminal activities showing up in their report.
  • Enforcement: This identifies which individual(s) or what department(s) that each ordinance points to as who is responsible for enforcing the ordinance. Note that in most cases, police are involved at some point in the process–while they may not directly enforce these ordinances in some cities, it is usually with their reports that the enforcing agent or department rely on to take action.

Several cities have asterisks (*) next to them. There are notes at the bottom of the table explaining unique differences with those cities.

As always, if you are a tenant who is impacted by one of these or other local ordinances throughout the state and you have questions, contact our tenant hotline: 612-728-5767 or via email at homelinemn.org/email

Hennepin County

City Codes/Ordinances Lease Addendum Required Criminal Background Search Required Enforcement
Bloomington* Repealed Bloomington City Code, Chapter 14, Article VIII, Division D (§ 14.581 – § 14.588) Yes Yes Police or Housing Inspector
Brooklyn Center Brooklyn Center City Code of Ordinances, Chapter 12 (§ 12-900 – 12-901, § 12-911 – 12-912A, § 12-914 – 12-916) Yes Yes City Manager or authorized designee
Brooklyn Park Brooklyn Park Code of Ordinances, Title XI, Chapter 117 (§ 117.49 – § 117.491) Yes No City Manager
Champlin Champlin, Minnesota – Code of Odinances, Part I, Chapter 30, Article II (§ 30-23, § 30-27 – 30-28) Yes No Enforcement officer (authorized agent of the city or qualified delagetee charged with enforcing this article)
Crystal Crystal City Code, Chapter IV, Section 425 (§425.21) No No Housing official
Dayton Dayton, MN Code of Ordinances, Title XI, Chapter 113 (§ 113.030 – 113.031) No No Code official (or any duly authorized representative)
Eden Prairie Eden Prairie City Code, Chapter 5, § 5.72 (Subd. 13 – 15) No No Administrative Authority (Fire Chief, Building Official, or their designee)
Edina Edina Code of Ordinances, Chapter 10, Article XVIII (§ 10-731) No No City manager
Excelsior Excelsior, MN  – Code of Ordinances, Chapter 8 (§ 8-155) No No Building official and/or authorized designee
Golden Valley* Repealed Golden Valley City Code, Chapter 16, (§ 16-56 i, 16-57 – 16-58) Yes No Police Department
Hanover Hanover City Code, Chapter 4 (§ 4.69 – 4.70, § 4.74 – 4.77) No No City Administrator and/or designee
Hopkins Hopkins City Code, Chapter 20, Article 3, Division 5 (§ 20-155, § 20-271 – 20-278) Yes Yes Building official and/or authorized designee
Maple Grove City of Maple Grove Code of Ordinances, Chapter 10, Article XI (§ 10-363) Yes Yes Police department determination, city administrator or designate enforcement
Medicine Lake City of Medicine Lake Ordinance No. 126 (§ 126) No No Code Official
Minneapolis* Minneapolis, MN – Code of Ordinances, Title 12, Chapter 244, Article XVI (§ 244.1890, § 244.1940, § 244.1960, & § 244.2020) No No Crime prevention specialist & Interdisciplinary review panel
New Hope* New Hope, MN – Code of Ordinances, Chapter 3 (§ 3-31 i) Yes* Yes* City manager or the manager’s designees
Orono Orono, MN Code of Ordinances Title IV, Chapter 26 Article IV (§ 26-87) No No City council or its designee
Osseo Osseo, MN Code of Ordinances, Title XV, Chapter 151 (§ 151.35) No No City Administrator and the City Council
Plymouth Plymouth City Code, Chapter IV, Section 410 (§ 410.23, § 410.42) No No Compliance Official (undefined?)
Robbinsdale* Robbinsdale City Code, Chapter 4 (§ 425.31 – 425.32) & Chapter 9 (§ 927) No* No City Manager*
St. Anthony St Anthony, Minnesota Code of Ordinances, Title XV, Chapter 150 (§ 150.132 – 150.134)  No No City Code Official
St. Bonifacius St Bonifacius Code of Ordinances, Title XV, Chapter 151 (§ 151.08)  No No Code Official or authorized designee
St. Louis Park* Most provisions repealed, some remaining amended provisions:  St. Louis Park City Code, Chapter 8, Subd. VIII (§ 8-328, 8-331, 8-322) No No Police Department*
Wayzata Wayzata Code of Ordinances, Part VIII, Section 815 (§ 815.05, § 815.17 – 815.24) Yes Yes Police Department 

*Notes:
Bloomington: Effective May 5, 2022, Bloomington repealed the crime-free provisions of their rental housing licensing code.
Golden Valley:
In November 2020, the city council repealed their ordinance.
New Hope: Lease Addendum and Criminal Background Search not required. Instead, landlords who use the addendum and perform a search can qualify for reduction in annual rental registration permit fee.
Minneapolis: This city amended their ordinance in late 2018 to alter how it works. An interdisciplinary review panel is tasked with reviewing and acting on violations of the ordinance. The review panel is comprised of representatives of multiple city departments (including staff from the police department), as well as representatives from public or private community, business or social service organizations.
Robbinsdale: In October 2020, the city council placed a one-year moratorium on enforcement of their ordinance in order to study it, later deciding in early 2022 to amend but not fully repeal the ordinance.
St. Louis Park: In August 2020 the St. Louis Park city council amended their ordinance to repeal the crime-free provisions, leaving only a few limited references to how disorderly use and police contacts can impact the status of a rental license.

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Mail

Recent HOME Line Posts

  • Central Minneapolis Renters Gathering with Problems, Leaving with Solutions
  • Hotline Update – May 2025
  • Let’s Amp Up Advocacy for Source of Income and Just Cause Protections
  • 6/18/2025: HOME Line Tenant/Landlord Webinar Series: Finding New Housing and Security Deposits
  • April Hotline Volume up 8% from 2024
  • In the Arena: Attending Legislative Meetings As a Newcomer
  • VISTA Member to Present Tenant Oral History Capstone Project
  • Overview of Tenant/Landlord Law CLE on May 8th!
  • Recording of 5/21/2025 HOME Line Tenant/Landlord Webinar: New City Ordinances
  • VISTA Member Harnesses Skill, Passion to Lead Creation of Duluth Tenants Union Zine
  • First Quarter Contacts Increased in 8 of Top 10 Categories
  • Recording of 4/23/2025 HOME Line Tenant/Landlord Webinar: Rental Housing Market Analysis with HousingLink
Archive of previous HOME Line news posts

Legal Resources

  • Form Letters
  • Local Minimum Heat Rules
  • Local Crime-Free Ordinance Policies
  • Important Statutes & Selected Cases
  • Selected Legislative History
  • Court Forms

HOME Line
8011 34th Ave S, Suite #126
Bloomington, MN 55425

HOME Line is a tax-exempt non-profit organization under Internal Revenue Code § 501(c)(3).

Our EIN is 41-1941115.

The original content within this website is © 1992–2025 HOME Line.